Textile countryside of the “winners” and “family deficit”

Why go to the countryside?

We first listen to the voices from the government: the State Council adopted proposed textile revitalization planning, and expanding domestic demand economy, develop the rural market. And then listen to the views of business: home appliances can go to the countryside, cars can go to the countryside, the farmers most in need of the textile and garment Why Can not go to the countryside? Start the rural market can be greatly digestion enterprises substantial inventory pressure.

As the end consumer of farmers, how they want? Experts have said: in rural areas of the textile and apparel outlets too little, can not meet the needs of modern farmers. This unanimous voice of the countryside, nature shows this is a win-win program. However, if the implementation of the textile to the countryside, and has no “family deficit” mean?

A real market economy, has to win there must be a loss. Textile countryside, the surface of this “family deficit” may be the government. The first is financial subsidies. According to the published program, household appliances, automobiles are taken to the countryside financial direct subsidies to farmers approach consumers, and textiles to the countryside, because merchandise belong to small, difficult to implement subsidies to farmers, the Government may take subsidized business methods, or be in such areas as tax and fee relief.

I am afraid that the most affected are the most basic level of government regulatory agencies. The rural market more difficult to start, a very important reason is that apparel sales are too low, an increase of sales outlets, the township level for the industry and commerce, taxation and other management agencies, will greatly increase the workload and management more difficult. If the area of taxes and fees to further implement the waiver policy will directly affect the grass-roots government revenue.

Grass-roots financial credit institutions may also be “lose.” By the financial crisis, tens of millions of migrant workers to return to rural areas, how to get them to rejoin the workforce, one way is to support entrepreneurship. The textile industry, a large number of migrant workers start on the financial and credit support required, and this grass-roots financial institutions have brought unprecedented challenges. However, the losses have certainly have won. Grass-roots government departments, financial institutions in this process has not benefited from it? The answer is yes.

First, they act as China’s domestic demand to start the engine of the economy for the country’s economic structural adjustment has made a real contribution. Secondly, the support of peasant entrepreneurship to alleviate the current pressing problem of employment of migrant workers, is conducive to the stability of social order. Furthermore, the industrial and commercial, taxation and financial credit institutions, the textile and the countryside has brought a lot of work despite the pressure, but the resulting market prosperity, economic development, the long term will bring more taxes and fees and interest income. More importantly, this comes from the grassroots and rural areas of prosperity and development of the economy as a whole country will bring fundamental change to address the lack of domestic demand, structural imbalances and major issues such as employment crisis.

In this sense, they are “winners.” River water has filled the river. The country as a whole and local grass-roots This complementary relationship, in general, I believe it is not difficult to understand people.